'I no' and 'I know'. What's the difference?
'I no' and 'I know'. What's the difference?
title
If you can look at my avatar for 19 minutes, without closing your eyes, you must be great.
"I know" means "I understand".
"I no" is not a sentence because "no" is just the opposite of "yes".
"I no" is not a sentence because "no" is just the opposite of "yes".
(✿ ◕ᗜ◕)━♫.*・。゚
Currently making synth music as treehann
I make 2d games too at: treehann.itch.io
My old sig-bar image broke but I'm still thanking Pauline and Janet forever for their art!
Currently making synth music as treehann
I make 2d games too at: treehann.itch.io
My old sig-bar image broke but I'm still thanking Pauline and Janet forever for their art!
- DEEMAN223344
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:07 pm
- DEEMAN223344
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:07 pm
- MyNameIsKooky
- Rainbow Spirit Master
- Posts: 9711
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:18 pm
I think he means stop saying "no" instead of "know" on purpose. I sort of agree, it is kind of a pain on the eyes.Marinus wrote:Stop what? And who do you think you are to tell me that I should stop?
(✿ ◕ᗜ◕)━♫.*・。゚
Currently making synth music as treehann
I make 2d games too at: treehann.itch.io
My old sig-bar image broke but I'm still thanking Pauline and Janet forever for their art!
Currently making synth music as treehann
I make 2d games too at: treehann.itch.io
My old sig-bar image broke but I'm still thanking Pauline and Janet forever for their art!
Theo, At least you find it funny, because of the laughing smiley.
And I agree too, but at the same time I disagree. (Anyone else who can that? )
I don't like if people use words which cause confusion, especially for people who use to talk a different language while the words are not on a translating website.
However, in order to make that point clear, I thought, doing it on purpose, was the most logical response on Deeman's post.
The same (dis)agreement on Kooky's post. The first line I fully agree. But the second line would only be true if it's about ^_^ getting the answer to his question. But not, if it's about us, having a fun conversation. For example, we could ask if ^_^ really didn't know the answer, or he asked a question on which he knew the answer, on purpose.
BB, no need to believe it or not believe it. Can't you see it with your own eyes? Or can't you believe you own eyes? And about the word: "we", doesn't that mean, (according to some of your dictionaries) some people including myself? or what? And I didn't see you gave an answer.
And I agree too, but at the same time I disagree. (Anyone else who can that? )
I don't like if people use words which cause confusion, especially for people who use to talk a different language while the words are not on a translating website.
However, in order to make that point clear, I thought, doing it on purpose, was the most logical response on Deeman's post.
The same (dis)agreement on Kooky's post. The first line I fully agree. But the second line would only be true if it's about ^_^ getting the answer to his question. But not, if it's about us, having a fun conversation. For example, we could ask if ^_^ really didn't know the answer, or he asked a question on which he knew the answer, on purpose.
BB, no need to believe it or not believe it. Can't you see it with your own eyes? Or can't you believe you own eyes? And about the word: "we", doesn't that mean, (according to some of your dictionaries) some people including myself? or what? And I didn't see you gave an answer.
Marinus wrote:Theo, At least you find it funny, because of the laughing smiley.
And I agree too, but at the same time I disagree. (Anyone else who can that? )
I don't like if people use words which cause confusion, especially for people who use to talk a different language while the words are not on a translating website.
However, in order to make that point clear, I thought, doing it on purpose, was the most logical response on Deeman's post.
The same (dis)agreement on Kooky's post. The first line I fully agree. But the second line would only be true if it's about ^_^ getting the answer to his question. But not, if it's about us, having a fun conversation. For example, we could ask if ^_^ really didn't know the answer, or he asked a question on which he knew the answer, on purpose.
BB, no need to believe it or not believe it. Can't you see it with your own eyes? Or can't you believe you own eyes? And about the word: "we", doesn't that mean, (according to some of your dictionaries) some people including myself? or what? And I didn't see you gave an answer.
Generation 59: Community experiment. The first time you see this, take the generation # and add 1. Put in your signature.
Yes it is!billy bob wrote:I can't believe this discussion is still going.
We've already given ^_^ the answer.
And you do same in the abandoned pirate topic!
And YOU did not gave any answer about the question, so you should not say "we've"
If you can look at my avatar for 19 minutes, without closing your eyes, you must be great.
- tyteen4a03
- Rainbow AllStar
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:16 am
- Contact:
- tyteen4a03
- Rainbow AllStar
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:16 am
- Contact:
Rules are important - this discussion isn't. You don't want to check all the words in the dictionary because this isn't a serious discussion. As for the rules, that's serious.Marinus wrote:BB, no need to believe it or not believe it. Can't you see it with your own eyes? Or can't you believe you own eyes? And about the word: "we", doesn't that mean, (according to some of your dictionaries) some people including myself? Or what? And I didn't see you give an answer.
And it's against the rules.Marinus wrote:It's just the way you call it. I call it flashy, and it's distracting my view on the forum very much.
Marinus:Marinus wrote:It's just the way you call it. I call it flashy, and it's distracting my view on the forum very much.
-_-
Its not really that distracting.
Tyteen:
Its a fake version of Luigi called Weegee.
If you can look at my avatar for 19 minutes, without closing your eyes, you must be great.
That's only your opinion, and I knew that. And you know I don't agree with that opinion, so there's no use in saying that at all.BB wrote:Rules are important - this discussion isn't. You don't want to check all the words in the dictionary because this isn't a serious discussion. As for the rules, that's serious.
If it's about rules you let you whole life and soul depend on dictionaries, but when it's about things other people may find more important which you don't find important, suddenly the dictionary isn't important anymore? Quite contradictory / inconsistent if you ask me.
About the rule for the signature I agree with you, but since I don't think rules are that important to ^_^ as they are to you, I thought I'd better ask him a different way. If it doesn't help there are always other possibilities.
^_^, I didn't say the picture is distracting, but it is very distracting to me. And it becomes even more distracting since you are posting very much, so the flashing picture is everywhere. Therefore I ask you once again, if you please will do me a favor by removing it.