FORGET THIS TOPIC, please, don't post anything on it, OK?

You've ultimately confused me, Emerald. Now I'm getting scared.Emerald141 wrote:Stinkersquad01 made a chomper texture he knew was bad, mainly so he could parody the recolorings and filters which are easy to slap together. Wonderman thought he was being serious and then proceeded to talk about himself. Then everyone got fed up with Wonderman again.
hey come back hereab-47 wrote:I don't think I exist here any more, as a texture designer.
StinkerSquad01 wrote:GUYS I MADE A NEW MONSTER TEXTURE IT'S A CHOMPER AND IT IS SOOO AWESOME I ADDED 38 FILTERS TO IT TOO DO YOU LIKE IT??![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does StinkerSquad normally talk in all caps, using no punctuation, spelling so with 3 o's and ending each sentence with a chain of smiley faces? Also, he often criticizes filters and recolorings, so do you think he would advertise them?
IT ALSO COMES IN 293486 OTHER RECOLORINGS THAT WILL BE UPLOADED SOON![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
293486 recolorings? And you think he's serious?
PLEASE GIVE COMMENTS ON THE BEST TEXTURE EVER![]()
![]()
Does this sound like StinkerSquad? He is not that egotistical.
Erm...noEmerald141 wrote:Are you sure you're in a good position to make that judgement?Wonderman109 wrote:this argument over what's considered art is a little spammy AND immature.
Self-centered, yes. I am like that sometimes even though I normally hate talking about myself.Emerald141 wrote:Really? Well, I don't suppose that you would care to explain these mostly irrelevant, self-centered comments you made:Wonderman109 wrote:I wasn't talking about myself very much; I'm not sure what you mean by that.Wonderman109 wrote:It reminds me of a much-improved version of my grid-chomper and made white and more intense.
I 'accept the challenge' to make something by hand too because I need to start putting more effort into my work anyways and this is a good thing to practice I prefer making spikeyballs, coins, and fireflowers over chompers, but if someone wants me to do something particular, I'm more than happy to. Expect me to have some textures for everyone ready some time tomorrow, it's getting late for me.Wonderman109 wrote:Anyways, I've finished a very measly example of my efforts without using recolouring, noise defining, solid shapes, or anything like that.Wonderman109 wrote:I did mine very quickly and without planning how it should look.
I would also point you to your random advertisements in MyNameIsKooky's custom adventure topic "Corrupted Folder"; those had even less to do with the intended topic than these.
Uh, I don't use the chatbox often, or I would've realized...I didn't think my rude actions were all that bad and attention-attracting...Emerald141 wrote:This is false. There was quite a bit of frustration happening on the chatbox, and this certainly isn't the first time your rude actions have attracted such attention.Wonderman109 wrote:And nobody got fed up with me about what I did -except you, apparently, or you wouldn't post your message.![]()
Somehow I find they seem like a way of expressing or appreciating a joke...I wasn't angry...I thought everyone would think I was agreeing about the laugh. Until I joined this forum, I never knew what a facepalm was and neither did anyone I know. At all. So I thought they were used for positive responses more than negative ones...Emerald141 wrote:It didn't seem like a joke at all. It seemed like you were angry at us without reason and were rudely calling us out. Facepalms are not funny.Wonderman109 wrote:If this is because you think I was being immature myself yesterday with the one billion or so facepalms, you should know I was joking myself with that. Having that many accounts would be a laugh.![]()
Emerald141 wrote:SS01 made the topic for the express purpose of making a satire of the cheap recolorings and filters out there; the texture was just a means to convey that satire.Wonderman109 wrote:let's just stop and talk about what this topic really is about - the texture SS01 made.
Emerald141 wrote: Am I appearing rude in this post? Probably. It's just that your behavior has been attracting large frustration from most of the users here for a while and I had to say something.
1. The texture is terrible, I made sure it was terrible, hearing someone say they like it doesn't mean I'll get all excited and shower them with praise.Wonderman109 wrote:I'm surprised you don't care about what I said regarding your texture and satire...
Uh, I don't want to get nor give any; I mean your satire fails in that I find it useful. I don't want you to get excited; I'm trying to tell you you need to work on your 'making something terrible on purpose' skills.StinkerSquad01 wrote: 1. The texture is terrible, I made sure it was terrible, hearing someone say they like it doesn't mean I'll get all excited and shower them with praise.
I have a bad habit of not caring how much effort is put into my work or into anyone else's. What matters to me is if it looks good in-game...because the texture is basically pointless and useless entirely if it looks horrible, right?StinkerSquad01 wrote: 2. Well, a satire is a satire, someone is bound to get hurt. I just find that the amount of cheapo recolorings and retexturings ridiculous, along with how easily you people are pleased by them.
Master Wonder Mage wrote:Wonderman109 wrote:StinkerSquad01 wrote: