Tricky Puzzles - Topic 3
Moderators: ~xpr'd~, tyteen4a03, Stinky, Emerald141, Qloof234, jdl
SOME PENGUINS ARE BLACK AND WHITE (fact)
OLD PHOTOGRAPHS ARE BLACK AND WHITE (fact)
I could go on. It's not about facts/opinions, it's about the syllogism not having a proper structure.
The correct structure, for your case, would look like this:
"All mammals are animals. All humans are mammals".
Aside from the all-inclusive word "all", the main difference is the first line. Notice that the order has been switched, compared to your version. That does matter logically.
OLD PHOTOGRAPHS ARE BLACK AND WHITE (fact)
I could go on. It's not about facts/opinions, it's about the syllogism not having a proper structure.
The correct structure, for your case, would look like this:
"All mammals are animals. All humans are mammals".
Aside from the all-inclusive word "all", the main difference is the first line. Notice that the order has been switched, compared to your version. That does matter logically.
Rest in peace, Kym. I hardly knew ya.
Rest in peace, Marinus. A bright star, you were ahead of me on my own tracks of thought. I miss you.
Rest in peace, Marinus. A bright star, you were ahead of me on my own tracks of thought. I miss you.
Right! Besides, those statements are no facts, they depend on agreements between people, about what's our definition of those terms.
In my opinion, the shortest definition of a mammal:
All living beings, where a mother produces milk to breastfeed a baby.
According to that definition, humans are mammals. Well, if someone agrees with that definition, and also agrees that mammals are animals, that person also has to agree, that humans are animals.
But, as Muzozavr says with some other words. I can agree with those 2 statements:
In my opinion, the shortest definition of a mammal:
All living beings, where a mother produces milk to breastfeed a baby.
According to that definition, humans are mammals. Well, if someone agrees with that definition, and also agrees that mammals are animals, that person also has to agree, that humans are animals.
But, as Muzozavr says with some other words. I can agree with those 2 statements:
does not mean that I agree that humans are animals.SOME ANIMALS ARE MAMMALS
WE ARE MAMMALS
- LittleZbot
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:51 pm
- Contact:
Highlight to see the answer to puzzle 1:
Deer. Every year more and more people run over them, causing crashes, which kills people.
Remember to look at the dates that every post is made. It's been many years, and I, and others, may not be the same people we were when we made them. This is a symbol of where we came from, and should be remembered as that.
- LittleZbot
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:51 pm
- Contact:
Technically, they do, since if the deer wasn't there the people wouldn't have died.
AND THAT WAS SOMEONE ELSE'S RIDDLE TO ME.
AND THAT WAS SOMEONE ELSE'S RIDDLE TO ME.
Remember to look at the dates that every post is made. It's been many years, and I, and others, may not be the same people we were when we made them. This is a symbol of where we came from, and should be remembered as that.
- LittleZbot
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:51 pm
- Contact:
I guess that's supposed to be the answer to my second question? Will you please put a link to it, then I'll take a look at it.
What about the answer to my first question?
- deer / tree
- people
- car
- battery of the car
- gas in the car
- road
- sun
- air
Perhaps you can say that those things are dangerous, but I don't think that all circumstances when someone is killed, have killed that person.
What about the answer to my first question?
Here are a few more, that you can fill in, instead of the dots:Technically, they do, since if the .... wasn't there the people wouldn't have died.
- deer / tree
- people
- car
- battery of the car
- gas in the car
- road
- sun
- air
Perhaps you can say that those things are dangerous, but I don't think that all circumstances when someone is killed, have killed that person.
- LittleZbot
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:51 pm
- Contact:
Actually, it was a response to your first question. And my brother gave me the riddle.
Remember to look at the dates that every post is made. It's been many years, and I, and others, may not be the same people we were when we made them. This is a symbol of where we came from, and should be remembered as that.
OK, I see there was some misunderstanding.LittleZbot wrote:Actually, it was a response to your first question. And my brother gave me the riddle.
I thought you were talking about a different riddle, that someone else had posted here on the forum, but it seemed you talked about the same riddle. Doesn't make difference to me though.AND THAT WAS SOMEONE ELSE'S RIDDLE TO ME.
I think the words "A has killed B" is only be used if the killing is done intentional, or in rage, but not if it happens in an accident. When there is a traffic accident, then perhaps there is a person to point out: Person A is responsible for the accident, but not: Person A has killed person B, because it's an accident.
And the deers are not even responsible for the accidents. We, humans are much more intelligent then deers (probably the biggest difference between humans and other animals

When I said this:
My question was actually if you agree with only the bold parts; not to have a talking about other dangerous plants. But you gave me an idea. Here is another easy riddle:So, you would also say: The most dangerous plant is a tree, because it kills so many humans in various gruesome ways?
In the area where I live (and much more places in the world) are some plants growing; if you sit for about 10 to 15 minutes under those plants, even without having physical contact with them, you're dead, unless you wear protection. What plant is that?
- boywhoflies
- Rainbow Spirit Chaser
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:16 pm
- tyteen4a03
- Rainbow AllStar
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:16 am
- Contact:
- LittleZbot
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3039
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:51 pm
- Contact:
I thought this was a pretty easy riddle, so I'm surprised that no more people seem to have an idea. So here is another hint:
Final and biggest hint before I give the answer. Only highlight if you're sure you want to knowNot only humans will die if they are at that place. Since this topic seems to be about mammals:In the end (as far as I know) all mammals will die. Not all of them within 15 minutes (BTW the 15 minutes was a rough guess); some may survive for an hour of perhaps a few hours, but in the end they will die.
If no one has any idea by tomorrow, I'll give the answer.Of other kinds of animals, other then mammals, some of them will also die, but there are also some, who have no single problem to be there for a very long time.
I will count that almost correct. However, seaweed can be above sealevel when it's ebb tide. In that case you could survive under it, for about 6 hours.peegman wrote:Seaweed!
The plant I had in mind is simply a water lily.

That lives in water which is almost always the same level, and the leaves and flower are no higher then the waterlevel.

- MyNameIsKooky
- Rainbow Spirit Master
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:18 pm