Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:09 pm
Wait until June, then we'll complain.StinkerSquad01 wrote:I bet progress isn't working out too well at the moment, huh?
Another sign of life could be useful.
A place to discuss all things Wonderland!
https://pcpuzzle.com/forum/
Wait until June, then we'll complain.StinkerSquad01 wrote:I bet progress isn't working out too well at the moment, huh?
Another sign of life could be useful.
Not going to happen.eee226 wrote:Can you put WA3 multiplayer. That would be fun!!!
At least, not in this release. I don't know if Blitz handles networking well, but let's see.MyNameIsKooky wrote:Not going to happen.eee226 wrote:Can you put WA3 multiplayer. That would be fun!!!
No.garirry wrote:It is release soon???
What do you mean???boywhoflies wrote:He has his life to attend to, ya know?
That would mean that everybody has to sign a contract so that no one would leak anything our, and some financial problems. It is just too complicated at some point.jozsefkoma wrote:It would be nice to recruit people from forum to make the game.
First of all we are good adventure makers.
I WANNA GET RECRUITED TOO. *shot*Emerald141 wrote:I agree. I'd be kinda surprised if Patrick didn't recruit one or all of MyNameIsKooky, you, and me.
Me too!Nobody wrote:I WANNA GET RECRUITED TOO. *shot*Emerald141 wrote:I agree. I'd be kinda surprised if Patrick didn't recruit one or all of MyNameIsKooky, you, and me.
That's actually what he did with MOFI. He got testers and eight(?) adventure designers including himself. He said he was going to do the same thing with POTZ, but with "more community involvement" which I suppose means more people working on it.tyteen4a03 wrote:That would mean that everybody has to sign a contract so that no one would leak anything our, and some financial problems. It is just too complicated at some point.jozsefkoma wrote:It would be nice to recruit people from forum to make the game.
First of all we are good adventure makers.
That's what I said.MyNameIsKooky wrote:That's actually what he did with MOFI.tyteen4a03 wrote:That would mean that everybody has to sign a contract so that no one would leak anything our, and some financial problems. It is just too complicated at some point.jozsefkoma wrote:It would be nice to recruit people from forum to make the game.
First of all we are good adventure makers.
I mean, if MS lets adventure designers and coders be able to access all POTZ information then that kind of stuff, but if it is MoFI like adventure submitting then it's okay.MyNameIsKooky wrote:That's actually what he did with MOFI. He got testers and eight(?) adventure designers including himself. He said he was going to do the same thing with POTZ, but with "more community involvement" which I suppose means more people working on it.tyteen4a03 wrote:That would mean that everybody has to sign a contract so that no one would leak anything our, and some financial problems. It is just too complicated at some point.jozsefkoma wrote:It would be nice to recruit people from forum to make the game.
First of all we are good adventure makers.
I'm still waiting for the opening to submit sample adventures. Hopefully it'll be some time in the near future.
Nope. Magic isn't the only thing that has "Control" and "Create" for operation names. Eg:Pawelec wrote:EDIT: ...and they reffer to magic. Only magic elements have Control and Create attributes...